Thoughts

Short thoughts, notes, links, and musings by . RSS

to the publications that stylize headlines and other content in ALL CAPS, but who use text-transform: uppercase instead of actually typing the headline in caps: i see you, i appreciate you, i love you

Seen a couple takes about the Hachette case along the lines of “the Internet Archive should’ve stuck to just archiving the Internet and not testing new theories of copyright” and uhhh... I’m not sure what it is you think the Internet Archive does, outside of testing new theories of copyright.

People have gotten so used to the existence of the Internet Archive’s web archive that they forget how revolutionary and subversive it is. The idea that that is somehow safe while the book lending was not is completely flawed. They were just up against a more powerful group.

What was the alternative? That they only archive and distribute works that are copyrighted by people with sufficiently little power/wealth?

Community memory

Happy Labor Day. I wrote a Wikipedia article about the gay, anarchist, anti-profit publishing collective Come!Unity Press after stumbling across a poster they printed in 1971.

Serendipitously, while researching this article I came across a March 2024 talk about “Survival By Sharing” by Paul Soulellis , which features a photograph of a Community Memory terminal.

I'd come across some photos of these while looking for public domain photos of computers a couple weeks ago, and was disappointed at the time that I couldn't find a better photo than ones like this on Wikimedia Commons (derived from a scan of a 1974 newsletter):

Image
Image

Soulellis’ talk, however, features a much better photo of this very same terminal at Leopold's Records in Berkeley, CA, likely taken at the same time based on the outfit of the person featured in both shots!

A high-quality black-and-white-photo of two people operating the same community memory machine as pictured in the above photo.

The talk, which focuses on community and archives and collaborative art and resistance, has some really interesting throughlines with some of the things I’ve been thinking a lot about lately.

The Signal Journal of International Political Graphics and Culture published an interview with an early member of the C!UP collective in issue 5. You can borrow a copy for free from the Internet Archive. I was curious how the anarchists went from operating a printing press for a group of Quakers in exchange for free rent to running the whole shop. Turns out it came down to conflicts over topics including their nudism and a "political prisoner" (kitten) named Kropotkin. Signal recounts the story.

There’s another story from an early member of the collective to be found in the comments of a site called The People’s Graphic Design Archive: “They liked th[e rainbow ink] effect so much that they charged extra to print plain black ink”.

LEE MOST MON, OCT 30, 2023 I crashed at the Come!Unity Press for several months in the early 1970s. Lin was very supportive and helped me “find myself” after I left home. I eventually decided against joining their collective, and became an apprentice locksmith instead, so I left their communal living space. One interesting thing collectors of their printed materials might like to know is the way they applied ink to the rollers of their offset printing press resulted in mass producing unique printed products that had a slightly different set of foreground and background colors each time the rollers printed a new page. Each run had different colors and no flyer had exactly the same colors as the one printed before it. They had a policy of recycling as much as they could, so they often reused paper by printing over old print jobs, which sometimes resulted in printed products with so much color that they were hard for color-blind people to read them. (The ADA would not be passed until decades later, but I'm sure Lin would have simply insisted on using different colors or trying out lighter and lighter background colors until the customer would give up and say it was legible!) They liked that effect so much that they charged extra to print plain black ink because it meant cleaning all the colored ink off each of the machine's rollers before printing plain black and then after that print run when the next run would use colored ink. Anyway, each of their print jobs was unique.
"Survival by Sharing".
Paul Solellis in his website.
It means always questioning. More than that: it means always deeply examining the less visible ideologies that lurk behind the design systems that govern how we live and communicate. For me this also means working with archives as *time machines,* and dialing back through history to see how others have resisted and persisted by making public against the grain, by “performing publishing” in their lives. What can we learn from their ongoing struggles for liberation, through their acts of making public?

Gay is angry

A poster that reads “gay is angry” above a collage of a timepiece with a burning fuse, surrounded by butterflies, emerging from a collage containing no parking signs, logos for companies including GE and Kodak, and pieces of magazine text. Between the collage and the text, in 90˚ rotated handwriting, is “gay revolution networker”. The whole poster is printed in multicolor ink creating a rainbow gradient.

Today’s archive spelunking led me down a rabbit hole trying to learn more about the “Gay Revolution Networker” mentioned in this poster from 1971 (full size). The “Gay is Angry” poster is from the Library of Congress’s Yanker Poster Collection, but the LOC provides no further information on the GRN.

Some research by Langdon Manor Books into a flyer in their catalog suggests that the Gay Revolution Networker was a New York City-based gay collective, which held meetings at locations including the Washington Square Church and the Come!Unity Press, a gay anarchist collective and print shop in New York City that I want to learn more about.

This flyer — itself a fascinating piece, described by Langdon as “a gorgeous enigma” — advertises a meeting for the GRN, but also includes on the opposite side an essay by a person named Velvet, which denounces the Gay Activist’s Alliance as sexist and complacent, and notes “the part about sexism goes for GRN too”.

while fighting a superficial battle against anti-gay discrimination, they affirm---through a convenient ignorance or complacency---their own discriminatory, unwritten policies against poor people, transvestites, and anyone defying the stereo-type role-playing which has become a trademark of the gay activists alliance. it is significant and tragic that the people who supervise things at the firehouse do a commendable job at examining the sexism of the straight community while refusing to examine or even acknowledge their own sexism. such has been the latest development in the straight-identified gay civil rights movement. naturally, gaa rejects the whole concept of a sexual revolution whereby those who have at least attempted to develop their own consciousness about sexism will be the new guiding force for gays coming out, the young people who must no longer be faced with the closety rhetoric of an organization that represents a dying consensus---the one that says its OK to be a superficial faggot as long as you polish, with diligent secrecy, your lambda button.......... the course of the gay movement is taking on a new sense of liberation these days. at last, there are people who are willing to recognize the whole spectrum of internal and external oppression, sexism from within and without, from you and me---and at last, we shall attempt radical change (revolution) within ourselves, perhaps the most challenging and important revolutionary action of our lives.---Velvet.
Image
Image

I wonder what else can be found about Velvet.

The front side of the flyer makes reference to the “GRN Tearoom”, quoting graffiti by John:

When the Church does the
    work of commerce,
And Business does the
    work of government,
And government does the
    work of criminals,
Then - it is time for criminals
    to do the work of the church.

Ryan Salame has withdrawn his petition from a week ago, in which he claimed the government had reneged on a promise not to continue their campaign finance investigation into his partner, Michelle Bond.

Bond was indicted on August 22 on campaign finance charges in connection to her unsuccessful 2022 campaign for a House seat in New York. Salame says he's withdrawing his petition now that the indictment has come down "to allow the facts to be developed by Ms. Bond, and a ruling to be made, in her case".