Activity tagged "free press"

Posted:

Bloomberg has responded to Justin Sun’s renewed motion for a temporary restraining order.

“This is a case involving a crypto billionaire who is upset because a news report said he had more of a certain cryptocurrency than he wanted the public to know — based on information that his own representatives provided on the record.”

preliminary injunction hearing in the ordinary course. There are several reasons apparent on the face of the Motion that show Plaintiff cannot possibly prevail on his Motion. First, the injunctive relief Plaintiff seeks is a clear prior restraint prohibited by the First Amendment. Temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions are almost never granted against journalists for what they have published or may publish; such prior restraints are permitted only in truly “exceptional cases,” such as where the speech at issue would reveal the movements of troop ships in war time. Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson, 283 U.S. 697, 716 (1931).2 But this is a case involving a crypto billionaire who is upset because a news report said he had more of a certain cryptocurrency than he wanted the public to know – based on information that his own representatives provided on the record. There is no colorable argument that a prior restraint could be supported here. 

Letter

Posted:

Crypto billionaire Justin Sun’s renewed motion for a temporary restraining order in his lawsuit against Bloomberg seems to confirm my view that the lawsuit was sparked by the disclosure that he controls 63% of the supply of TRX.

1. Requiring Defendants, preliminarily until the hearing, and thereafter indefinitely, to remove the amounts of any specific cryptocurrency owned by Mr. Sun from any of its online publications; 2. Requiring Defendants, preliminarily until the hearing, and thereafter indefinitely, to retract its claim that Mr. Sun owns 60 billion Tronix and controls the majority of its supply; and 3. Enjoining Defendants, preliminarily until the hearing, and thereafter indefinitely, Defendants from publishing the amounts of any specific cryptocurrency owned by Mr. Sun in any future publication.

Sun and Bloomberg had been “engaged in discussions that may moot the emergency relief”, but it sounds like Sun wanted more than they were willing to agree to.

Read:
“FCC To Install A 'Bias Monitor' At New CBS To Ensure Network Kisses Trump's Ass”.
Karl Bode in Techdirt. Published .
And with the internet eating major broadcasters’ lunch, it’s very likely that the Ellison family paid billions of dollars for a network whose fortunes are headed to the toilet, and whose viewers are headed elsewhere. They have the potential to create a right wing propaganda bullhorn that rivals Fox News; but it’s just as likely their disastrous management turns the network of Walter Cronkite into a sad, historical footnote.
Read:
“Old Tricks, New Tech: How Legacy Media Capture Fuels Today's Digital Authoritarianism”.
Marius Dragomir and Minna Aslama Horowitz in Tech Policy Press. Published .
This model of media capture has since become a case study in soft authoritarian control. Its blueprint rests on four pillars: the takeover of public media, the political capture of the media regulator, the deployment of state funds as leverage over editorial content, and the strategic acquisition of private outlets. This formula has been successfully exported—with variations—to other countries. ... Efforts to manipulate the media are nothing new; history is littered with regimes that sought to bend the press to their will. What distinguishes this modern form of capture, however, is the role of the private sector. Corporations reliant on government contracts or regulatory leniency buckled under pressure, buying up media outlets and turning them into mouthpieces of state propaganda. In the digital age, media capture is often coupled with digital authoritarianism, where governments and non-state actors collaborate to use technologies to conduct surveillance, restrict access to information, and distort the journalistic ecosystem with authoritarian-friendly outlets and campaigns of disinformation.
Posted:

Lawsuits like this one are not something to celebrate just because you hate Fox News.

I'm not normally one to agree with Fox, but they're right in their statement that suits like this are "designed to chill free speech critical of [Newsom]."

“Gavin Newsom sues Fox News for $787M in defamation case over Trump call”.
Tyler Katzenberger in Politico.
The California governor accused Fox News of defamation in a lawsuit Friday morning, alleging the network should fork over $787 million after host Jesse Watters claimed Newsom lied about his phone calls with Trump, who ordered National Guard troops to Los Angeles this month.
Posted:

Looking forward to the full-throated condemnation of this letter by those who accused the Biden administration of pressuring social media firms to moderate COVID-19 and election fraud misinfo! Any second now...

“Trump DOJ goon threatens Wikipedia”.
Emma Roth in The Verge.
Ed Martin, interim US attorney for DC, has written a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation, threatening its status as a nonprofit entity.
Posted:

Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal again making oblique legal threats to chill criticism of Coinbase, suggesting to The Hill that it might be “defamatory” for me or Public Citizen to draw a line from their political spending to the current crypto regulatory environment.

Now, critics are putting the industry’s ramped-up campaign involvement last cycle under a microscope. Molly White, a cryptocurrency researcher and prominent crypto skeptic, argued the SEC’s changes in direction were the “goal of a lot of the election spending over the last couple of years.” “I think that the political contributions were quite directly related to both the changing regulatory environment in terms of, you know, broad policy direction, but also in terms of dropping the enforcement action,” White told The Hill. Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization, slammed Coinbase and the SEC last week, arguing the industry’s campaign spending “paid off.” “The SEC decision is also an important marker in the Trump administration’s rush to abandon prosecution and enforcement actions against corporate criminals and wrongdoers,” Public Citizen co-President Robert Weissman wrote. “This is not just an abandonment of those already wronged by corporate wrongdoers, it is an invitation to a corporate crime spree and epidemic of corporate wrongdoing.”
Coinbase, along with other figures in the crypto world, fiercely rejected the criticism, pointing out opposition to Gensler’s probes was brewing for years. This included long before Trump publicly reversed his stance on crypto to back the industry in late 2023. “I find those comments misinformed at best, if I’m being generous, and defamatory at worst,” Paul Grewal, chief legal officer at Coinbase, told The Hill of the backlash. Some criticism, Grewal argued, fails to consider Trump was once a critic of crypto and at one point called it a “scam.” Grewal pointed out how Congress moved major legislation in 2023 on market structure, an issue that was met with bipartisan support. The Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act in 2023 received support from 71 Democrats in the House. “The fact of the matter is that President Trump did evolve and transform in his view on crypto, really starting in December 2023,” Grewal said. “In January 2024, we first started to engage with him and his team, but it was against a much more nuanced, complicated and complete history that I think a lot of the critics just don’t want to engage in.”

Previously:

Tweet by paulgrewal.eth on October 30, 2024 @iampaulgrewal Once again, with feeling. Repeating misrepresentations of facts after previously being put on notice is …. unwise. Quoted tweet by Molly White @molly0xFFF As an active federal contractor, Coinbase is prohibited from making political contributions, including to super PACs. This makes $50 million that they have contributed in violation of pay-to-play laws for contractors.

“Some criticism, Grewal argued, fails to consider Trump was once a critic of crypto and at one point called it a ‘scam.’ ... ‘[It’s a] more nuanced, complicated and complete history that I think a lot of the critics just don’t want to engage in.’”

Huh.

Screenshot of Molly White’s Citation Needed newsletter: “Recently, there has been a push by the cryptocurrency industry to portray crypto as a major issue that will influence votes in the upcoming election season. This just so happens to coincide with Donald Trump's recent statements suggesting he's warmed to the industry. Although Trump personally has actually been far more vocally anti-crypto than Joe Biden — in 2021 saying bitcoin “just seems like a scam”1 and reportedly ordering Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin to “go after bitcoin” in 20182 — that hasn’t stopped many in the cryptocurrency world from embracing him as the supposedly pro-crypto candidate anyway. Screenshot of Trump tweets: I am not a fan of Bitcoin and other Cryptocurrencies, which are not money, and whose value is highly volatile and based on thin air. Unregulated Crypto Assets can facilitate unlawful behavior, including drug trade and other illegal activity.... ....Similarly, Facebook Libra’s “virtual currency” will have little standing or dependability. If Facebook and other companies want to become a bank, they must seek a new Banking Charter and become subject to all Banking Regulations, just like other Banks, both National... ...and International. We have only one real currency in the USA, and it is stronger than ever, both dependable and reliable. It is by far the most dominant currency anywhere in the World, and it will always stay that way. It is called the United States Dollar! It's not entirely clear why Trump has done a U-turn. Perhaps it's simply because supporting crypto has become the Republican thing to do. Perhaps it was because he himself discovered the grift potential this industry unlocks when released his own set of NFTs in 2022 [W3IGG]."
Screenshot of a Public Citizen article titled “Guaranteed Crypto Loss”: “Bitcoin, a cryptocurrency, is “based on thin air.” It is a “scam.” It can facilitate unlawful behavior, including drug trade and other illegal activity.” These are Public Citizen positions. But they are also direct comments from then President Donald J. Trump. Public Citizen continues to believe cryptocurrency is a Ponzi scheme and enables illicit activity. It also wastes enormous energy, contributing to climate change. We support the efforts of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to enforce securities law with respect to these public offerings, and of criminal law enforcers to arrest crypto actors who engage in fraud and other market manipulations. The FBI reported crypto-related fraud exceeded $5 billion in 2023. Trump, however, has pivoted into full-throated and potentially self-enriching endorsement of the sector. He now serves as the “chief crypto advocate” for World Liberty Financial, a nascent cryptocurrency firm. If elected president, Trump would have a glaring conflict of interest as Washington attempts to address policy for this fraud-ridden sector.”