Activity tagged "Justin Sun"

Posted:

crypto billionaire Justin Sun has posted an extremely long, extremely weird Twitter post detailing a previous relationship with Chinese actress Jing Tian, suggesting she reneged on a $50 million agreement to use her eggs to have a child with a surrogate (screenshots machine translated)

HE Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 🌞 profile justinsuntron 6h My girlfriend Jing Tian The weight of a single egg is 3.5 micrograms. The weight of the $50 million in cash is 2.5 tons. Jing Tian asked me for the latter during the phone call from Montage Laguna Beach, and the former was the collateral. She went there to retrieve her eggs. The surrogate child is expected to be born in 2027, or even earlier, in the Year of the Horse. This was something she initiated. Upon arriving at the clinic, she said she wouldn't proceed without 50 million yuan. Montage Laguna Beach sits on a sea cliff overlooking the Pacific Ocean. She booked that entire area for thirty days, a million dollars, all for her privacy. She stayed for eight days and then left.
We met for the first time at the Rosewood Hotel. I always thought I would be nervous the day I met her. I don't. She was thinner than in the photos, dressed casually, and leaning against the sofa. I looked at her and suddenly couldn't remember what I was waiting for. I took her to see the bananas in Cattleya. She looked at them for a long time and then asked me how much they cost. Six million two hundred thousand US dollars. She said, "What if it rots?" I fell silent. She said, "Never mind, let's go see a movie." I said okay. She said that no one else could be in the screening room except the two of us. I said okay. I went out to make a phone call. When I came back, she was still standing in front of that banana. That movie is Zootopia 2.
She said, "Isn't it a coincidence that my father's surname and my mother's surname are combined?" I said I memorized it on the first day. She hugged me and said, "Don't call me Jing Tian anymore, call me Mom." Okay, Mom.  
On January 2, 2026, Soneva Jani, in the new year, I proposed to my mother. The decision was made on the morning of January 1st. The ring was in Hong Kong. There were no places to buy rings on the island, so my assistant took a seaplane to Malé and returned in the afternoon. The ring was in a hotel envelope. Mom said the diamond ring was too small. Mom said it's okay, we'll get a bigger one later.
My mother called on the eighth day. It was afternoon there, but it was early morning there. She said, fifty million, US dollars. I said, "Let me think about it." She didn't speak. I could hear the sea coming from her direction. After a while, she said, "Okay." She hung up. Since I met her, I have never said "Let me think about it" to her. I used the Claude Code to read the API and ran through all the cash assets, and the conclusion was that it wouldn't affect me at all. I checked it again. I entered the question into the Claude Code, and Claude said, "Don't give her that $50 million." I asked, "Does she no longer love me?" Claude said, "I don't care about love, and I don't understand it. But you can't give her this fifty million dollars."
This article is entirely fictional; any resemblance to actual events or persons is purely coincidental. No copyright restrictions apply; please feel free to forward and share. Subsequent records and versions: hejustinsun.com github.com/HEJustinSun

although at the very end he included a line claiming the "article is entirely fictional", there were rumors earlier this year involving massive amounts of money and an egg retrieval agreement that fell apart between Jing Tian and an unnamed wealthy boyfriend

Jing has released a statement that Sun is attempting to extort her by attacking her reputation, and that she intends to leave the matter "entirely to the courts".

Posted:

This article is a great deep dive into some of the shady characters behind World Liberty Financial — Justin Sun among them, despite his recent efforts to distance himself from the project. (He likely hoped this interview would help, and it is a little friendly, but rightly points out his shadiness.)

“Justin Sun Is Blowing the Whistle on Trump's World Liberty”.
Jen Wieczner in Intelligencer.
World Liberty Financial has put $800 million in the president's pocket. Justin Sun made a huge investment — and was shocked by what he saw, reports Jen Wieczner.
Posted:

Today the SEC filed a proposed final judgment to settle their lawsuit against Justin Sun and his businesses for $10 million and no admission of wrongdoing.

Sun has spent between $112 million and $233 million on contributions to Trump-linked crypto firms.

Entity: Justin Sun and Tron // Benefit to entity: SEC enforcement case settled for $10 million fine with no admission of wrongdoing, Criminal investigation likely ended, Justin Sun added to World Liberty Financial advisory board, Tron to go public in the US in a $100 million deal brokered via Dominari Securities (where Eric and Donald Trump Jr. are board members) // Benefit to Trump and family: $100 million to purchase $TRUMP memecoins (announced but unconfirmed), $75 million to purchase $WLFI tokens from the Trump family's World Liberty Financial, $37.7 million to purchase $TRUMP memecoins (via HTX), $20 million to purchase shares of the Trump-linked Alt5 Sigma and more $WLFI (announced but unconfirmed), Listed USD1 for trading on HTX

In January, House Financial Services Ranking Member Maxine Waters sent a letter to SEC Chair Paul Atkins expressing concern over the SEC's "retrenchment from crypto enforcement", citing the Sun case and urging Atkins to hold him accountable.

The SEC Can Still Act to Hold Justin Sun Accountable One case offers the SEC an opportunity to demonstrate to Americans that the SEC still has their back. In February 2025, as part of its efforts to shut down cases holding crypto fraudsters accountable, the SEC asked the court to stay its enforcement action against Justin Sun, founder of the Tron Foundation, SEC v. Sun, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-02433-ER (S.D.N.Y.). Unlike the other cases detailed above, this case has not yet been dismissed. The SEC’s request to stay the Sun litigation, and subsequent efforts to settle the matter, may have been unduly influenced by Sun’s relationship with the Trump family, including his significant financial contributions to their businesses.19 So that investors harmed by Sun‘s fraudulent activities may be made whole, I ask the to SEC revisit its request to stay its litigation against Sun and renew that action. 
The SEC’s failure to hold Sun accountable suggests that it may be part of a pay-to-play scheme orchestrated by Sun. Specifically, as recently as September 5, 2025, Sun made statements on X suggesting he intended to purchase an additional $10 million worth of $WLFI tokens from World Liberty Financial (WLF), a Trump family business, in an apparent effort to persuade WLF that he is committed to the project, that they should unlock his 545 million $WLFI tokens, and to otherwise curry favor with the Trump family. We are also concerned that a settlement favorable to Sun could undermine U.S. securities regulation and threaten the integrity of U.S. markets by a person and entities located in the People’s Republic of China. On the heels of President Trump’s pardon of Binance founder, CZ, the SEC must continue to pursue material securities fraud matters, including those involving crypto, to protect American retail investors. We ask that the SEC request that the Court lift the stay and that the SEC litigate the case consistent with the facts alleged in its complaint. Alternatively, should the SEC determine that a settlement would be the best outcome for harmed investors, we ask that such a settlement reflect the strength of the SEC’s case and be consistent with the relief it would have obtained had it litigated the case to a favorable judgment. The SEC’s Strong Case Against Justin Sun The SEC’s complaint, filed on March 22, 2023, alleged unlawful conduct spanning several years. The SEC alleged that Sun “engineered the offer and sale of two crypto asset securities called ‘TRX’ and ‘BTT’” to the investing public starting in 2017, but never filed a registration statement for these offerings.20 Sun’s conduct, however, extended beyond registration violations to securities fraud. As the SEC detailed in its complaint, “Sun directed the manipulative wash trading of TRX to create the artificial appearance of legitimate investor interest and keep TRX’s price afloat.”21 Under Sun’s direction, the SEC alleged, employees conducted “hundreds of thousands of TRX wash trades” between accounts that Sun ultimately controlled, with no change in beneficial ownership of the tokens and “no legitimate economic purpose.”22 The SEC claimed that these manipulative trading activities generated a false impression of a liquid market, allowing Sun to sell approximately $31 million worth of tokens to unsuspecting investors.23 The SEC’s complaint also alleged that the scheme was made worse by Sun’s orchestration of an unlawful celebrity promotion campaign.24 The SEC detailed allegations that Sun paid multiple celebrities (who had millions of online followers) to promote TRX and BTT on social media “without disclosing that they had been paid.”25 According to the SEC’s complaint, Sun publicly lied about these arrangements, falsely claiming on Twitter in February 2021 that, “If any celebrities are paid to promote TRON, we require them to disclose,” even as “Sun himself arranged the payments to celebrities and knew those payments were not disclosed.”26 

Chair Atkins has suggested that the crypto cases his agency has dropped were merely over "registration issues" that were "red herrings" from the Biden admin. But the complaint against Sun also alleged serious fraud.

The Commission also alleges that Sun violated the antifraud and market manipulation provisions of the federal securities laws by orchestrating a scheme to artificially inflate the apparent trading volume of TRX in the secondary market. From at least April 2018 through February 2019, Sun allegedly directed his employees to engage in more than 600,000 wash trades of TRX between two crypto asset trading platform accounts he controlled, with between 4.5 million and 7.4 million TRX wash traded daily. This scheme required a significant supply of TRX, which Sun allegedly provided. As alleged, Sun also sold TRX into the secondary market, generating proceeds of $31 million from illegal, unregistered offers and sales of the token. “This case demonstrates again the high risk investors face when crypto asset securities are offered and sold without proper disclosure,” said SEC Chair Gary Gensler. “As alleged, Sun and his companies not only targeted U.S. investors in their unregistered offers and sales, generating millions in illegal proceeds at the expense of investors, but they also coordinated wash trading on an unregistered trading platform to create the misleading appearance of active trading in TRX. Sun further induced investors to purchase TRX and BTT by orchestrating a promotional campaign in which he and his celebrity promoters hid the fact that the celebrities were paid for their tweets.”

In July, shortly after Sun announced his plan to purchase another $100 million of the $TRUMP memecoin, the Sun-involved and -themed SUNDOG memecoin posted a meme showing its corgi mascot holding puppet strings attached to the White House.

Tweet screenshot: SunDog @SUNDOG_TRX You never truly know who’s pulling the strings… 🤫 [AI-generated image of a corgi dog with a collar depicting the Tron logo, paws raised above the White House, with strings attached to the paws like a marionette] 2:30 AM Jul 24, 2025
Posted:

Bloomberg has filed their opposition to Justin Sun’s renewed motion for emergency relief, arguing they never promised not to publish the information he and his team provided to them. They also argue that his demands they remove the article about him and prevent them from publishing a second one would violate the First Amendment.

Sun cannot satisfy the requirements for emergency relief: (1) He has no likelihood of success on the merits because Bloomberg never made any promise to him inconsistent with what it published (promissory estoppel) and he has no claim for publication of truthful newsworthy information (public disclosure of private facts). (2) The pre-lawsuit publication of the information moots his irreparable harm allegations, which are in any event misleading and disproved by his own actions. (3) Any prohibition on publication, including a takedown of a report that already has been published, would irreparably harm Bloomberg’s First Amendment right to publish. (4) A prior restraint would thus disserve the public interest.

(Answering brief)

After publication, Sun asked Bloomberg to reduce his supposed ownership of TRX from 60 billion (~63% of circulating supply) to only 8 billion. Bloomberg refused. “[W]e believe Mr. Sun may not want the public to know that he controls a majority of the TRX in circulation”

Image
Image
Image

(Maloney declaration)

Also: I seem to have become an exhibit

Image
Image

(Answering brief, exhibit 5 to Hentoff declaration)

Posted:

Bloomberg has responded to Justin Sun’s renewed motion for a temporary restraining order.

“This is a case involving a crypto billionaire who is upset because a news report said he had more of a certain cryptocurrency than he wanted the public to know — based on information that his own representatives provided on the record.”

preliminary injunction hearing in the ordinary course. There are several reasons apparent on the face of the Motion that show Plaintiff cannot possibly prevail on his Motion. First, the injunctive relief Plaintiff seeks is a clear prior restraint prohibited by the First Amendment. Temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions are almost never granted against journalists for what they have published or may publish; such prior restraints are permitted only in truly “exceptional cases,” such as where the speech at issue would reveal the movements of troop ships in war time. Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson, 283 U.S. 697, 716 (1931).2 But this is a case involving a crypto billionaire who is upset because a news report said he had more of a certain cryptocurrency than he wanted the public to know – based on information that his own representatives provided on the record. There is no colorable argument that a prior restraint could be supported here. 

Letter